choosing a rich text editor
I'm working on a project that needs a WYSIWYG editor, so I've been investigating several of them. "TinyMCE":http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/ worked well, but I have a beef with its configuration. It seems flexible enough, but I don't have a desire to write my own plugin. I simple just want to add/remove buttons as I please.
I've used "HTMLArea":http://www.dynarch.com/projects/htmlarea/ in the past, and found it to be pretty decent. It's the only one I know that comes with a free cross-platform spell checking component as well. However, the project seems stagnant. The final killing blow is that the "prototype":http://prototype.conio.net library interferes with it. Maybe I can dig in there and figure out why, but I don't quite feel like it right now. That's a shame, because it's simple to configure and works well.
I've personally never liked actually using any of these editors, as they all seem a bit dodgy to me. However, there are still people that can't grok simple formatting symbols. They don't know what RSS is, or care about your blogs. They just want to write copy for their website. It just seems natural that the browser should have a decent writing environment to accomodate that.
Web services are an option, but I'd still prefer to have something that doesn't require an installation. Also, Jeremy briefly talks about "using RailsFS to manage your document workflow":http://www.jvoorhis.com/articles/2005/09/26/ideas-for-railsfs. Hmm.
related
- 2010 Jul 13 In-Process Node.js Queues
- 2010 Jul 07 Geek Talk Interview
- 2010 Jun 28 Tee and Child Processes
- 2010 Jun 23 You can let go now
- 2010 May 17 Railsconf: Building APIs
- 2010 May 10 Nori: Node.js Riak wrapper
- 2010 May 10 No, I did not create a mobile phone framework too
- 2010 May 04 Escaping your test suite with your life
- 2010 Apr 05 Will the iPad kill comic books?
- 2010 Apr 05 First day at GitHub

